Stepped-Frequency Processing by Reconstruction of Target Reflectivity Spectrum

 

Andrew J. Wilkinson, Richard T. Lord and Michael R. Inggs

The authors are with the Radar Remote Sensing Group,
University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa.
Phone +27 21 650 2799, Fax +27 21 650 3465, Email:  rlord-avoidspam@ebe.uct.ac.za.
 
 
Note --- This paper has been published at the Comsig'98 conference.  A pdf version of this paper can be downloaded here:  comsig98b.pdf

Abstract --- This paper describes a processing technique for combining stepped-frequency waveforms efficiently to obtain higher range resolution. Essentially this method involves the reconstruction of a wider portion of the target's reflectivity spectrum by combining the individual spectra of the transmitted narrow-bandwidth pulses in the frequency domain. This paper describes the signal processing steps involved, and shows simulation results which validate and illustrate the method.

Keywords --- Stepped-frequency processing, synthetic range profile, SRP, target reflectivity spectrum.
 

I. Introduction

The use of stepped-frequency waveforms to obtain high range resolution is well documented [8, 10]. An advantage of the stepped-frequency approach for obtaining high range resolution is the reduction of the instantaneous bandwidth and sampling rate requirements of the radar system.

Synthetic range profile (SRP) processing is a very effective method to obtain high-resolution downrange profiles of targets [10]. This method, however, has the unfortunate drawback that target energy spills over into consecutive coarse range bins due to the matched filter operation, causing ``ghost images'' in the resulting range profile [3]. This is the main reason why it is not regarded as a suitable method for processing SAR images. A time-domain method which does not have this drawback has already been demonstrated [5, 6]. However this method has been found to be inefficient due to the upsampling requirement of the narrow-bandwidth signals.

Instead of recombining the stepped-frequency waveforms in the time-domain, they can also be recombined in the frequency domain. Essentially the aim is to reconstruct a larger portion of the target's reflectivity spectrum by combining the individual spectra of the transmitted narrow-bandwidth pulses in the frequency domain. The target reflectivity function tex2html_wrap_inline596 represents the target's reflection properties at range r mapped into the time domain, where tex2html_wrap_inline600 . The principle of enhancing the range resolution by recovering a larger band of the reflectivity's spectrum was introduced by Prati and Rocca [7], but in the context of coherent combination of SAR images taken from different observation angles. In this paper we show how this concept may be applied to the concept of stepped-frequency processing, and describe the signal processing steps involved.
 

II. Waveform Modelling

A linear FM chirp waveform at baseband can be described by

equation74

where A is the amplitude, tex2html_wrap_inline604 the pulse length and tex2html_wrap_inline606 the chirp rate. The spectrum is approximately rectangular with bandwidth tex2html_wrap_inline608 . This is a good approximation for linear FM chirp pulses with a high time-bandwidth product.

The transmitted RF signal is modelled by

equation83

where tex2html_wrap_inline610 is the centre frequency. The received signal is given by the convolution of the scene reflectivity function tex2html_wrap_inline596 and the transmitted pulse:
 
               align88
 
After coherent demodulation, the signal at baseband is given by
 
     align93
 
In accordance with the Nyquist criteria, the I and Q channels of this complex signal are each sampled at a sampling rate of tex2html_wrap_inline618 . Fourier transforming tex2html_wrap_inline620 we obtain

equation105

Thus, the spectral representation of the received signal can be viewed as a windowed version of the target's reflectivity spectrum tex2html_wrap_inline622 , where the position of the window is determined by the centre frequency, and the shape is determined by the spectrum of the transmitted pulse.

Range compression is achieved by convolving the received signal with a linear compression filter H(f), designed as a trade-off between compressing the received signal into a narrow pulse (with desirable low sidelobe properties) and improving the signal to noise ratio. In the frequency domain the range-compression operation is given by
 
                align109
 
where tex2html_wrap_inline626 . The time-domain signal is

equation114

The phase of H(f) is always chosen to cancel the phase of P(f), thus tex2html_wrap_inline632 . The amplitude of H(f) is chosen according to the desired time-domain impulse response. For example, if we assume that P(f) is strictly bandlimited to tex2html_wrap_inline590 , and if tex2html_wrap_inline640 across that bandwidth, then

equation119

This is simply a bandlimited, shifted version of the target's reflectivity spectrum. Inverse transforming, the time-domain waveform is

equation125

where tex2html_wrap_inline642 . Thus the time-domain impulse response is a sinc function with a tex2html_wrap_inline644 dB resolution of tex2html_wrap_inline646 . The sidelobe response can be reduced by introducing an appropriate frequency-domain window function, at the expense of widening the mainlobe.
 

III. Reconstruction of Target Spectrum

 
figure145
 
Figure 1: Reconstruction of the target reflectivity spectrum for n=4 transmitted pulses,
each with carrier frequency tex2html_wrap_inline588 and bandwidth tex2html_wrap_inline590
 
 
It is now proposed to reconstruct a wider portion of the target's reflectivity spectrum by piecing together several adjacent subportions of the spectrum, each obtained by separate transmission and reception of pulses of bandwidth tex2html_wrap_inline590 , but stepped appropriately in frequency by appropriate choice of the carrier frequency. If the frequency step tex2html_wrap_inline650 , the desired reconstruction is possible. Assuming a sequence of n adjacent windows (indexed by tex2html_wrap_inline654), a broad region of the frequency spectrum can be reconstructed, symmetrical about zero, by shifting each spectrum at baseband by an amount

equation140

in the positive direction, and adding together the shifted versions.
 
If we assume a linear superposition of the shifted subspectra, the reconstructed spectrum as shown in Figure 1 is
 
      align154
 
where tex2html_wrap_inline588 is the carrier frequency of pulse i and tex2html_wrap_inline666 is the frequency spectrum at baseband of pulse i. The shift tex2html_wrap_inline670 can, by substitution and simplification, be seen to be the centre frequency tex2html_wrap_inline672 of the entire reconstructed spectrum:
 
         align172
 
The reconstructed spectrum can thus be expressed as
 
           align187

where

equation198

The time-domain signal can then be obtained by inverse transforming to yield

equation204

If, for example, we consider the case where the frequency step tex2html_wrap_inline674 , then the total bandwidth of the reconstructed spectrum is tex2html_wrap_inline676 , as is shown in Figure 1. If the combined compression filter

equation214

is chosen such that tex2html_wrap_inline678 , then the time-domain signal is

equation224

and the 3dB resolution is tex2html_wrap_inline682 , which is a factor of n better than would have been achieved without reconstruction.
 

IV. Practical Implementation on Sampled Data

The steps below describe how the spectral reconstruction can be performed with sampled data.
  1. Choose a range of carrier frequencies tex2html_wrap_inline718 spaced at tex2html_wrap_inline690 equal to, or marginally less than tex2html_wrap_inline590 . If tex2html_wrap_inline724 , the reconstructed spectrum will contain gaps and the resulting time-domain range profile will possess undesirable properties in the form of repeated artifacts spaced at multiples of tex2html_wrap_inline726 . However even if there are gaps, an improvement in mainlobe resolution is still possible.
  2.  For each pulse obtain a sampled version of tex2html_wrap_inline620 , starting at tex2html_wrap_inline730 , with tex2html_wrap_inline618 being the complex sample rate.
  3.  Apply an FFT to each sampled pulse to obtain the individual subspectra of the target's reflectivity spectrum.
  4.  To obtain an optimal SNR, it is important to sum the signals with appropriate weighting in the overlap regions. This may be realised by matched-filtering each subspectra prior to addition.
  5.  Since tex2html_wrap_inline620 was sampled starting at tex2html_wrap_inline730 , each subspectrum has to be multiplied by the delay compensation factor tex2html_wrap_inline738 .
  6.  Shift the spectrum of pulse i to its appropriate location, centred on tex2html_wrap_inline742 .
  7.  Form the combined spectrum by coherently adding the individual subspectra (see Figure 2).
  8.  Multiply the combined spectrum by the compression filter tex2html_wrap_inline744 (see Figure 3) to obtain the discrete equivalent of tex2html_wrap_inline746 (see Figure 4).
  9.  Multiply the entire spectrum with tex2html_wrap_inline748 . This re-shifts the time domain back to a sampled set beginning at tex2html_wrap_inline750 .
  10.  Apply a reshaping window to tailor the time domain response (see Figure 4). This could be a standard Hanning or Taylor window.
  11.  Inverse FFT the entire spectrum to obtain the high-resolution range profile (see Figure 5).
 
 
figure276
 
Figure 2: Spectrum obtained after coherent addition of frequency-shifted subspectra.
 

 

figure283
 
Figure 3: Spectrum of compression filter tex2html_wrap_inline744 .
 
 
 
 figure330
 
Figure 4: Target reflectivity spectrum tex2html_wrap_inline746 after applying compression filter,
and after applying reshaping window.
 
 
 
figure345
 
Figure 5: Section of high-resolution range profile showing point target.

 

V. Design of Compression Filter

The design of the compression filter tex2html_wrap_inline744 is the most critical and important step in this method. It is important to consider the following points when constructing this filter:  

VI. Simulation Results

A stepped-frequency radar system was simulated to validate and illustrate the method described above. Table I summarises the relevant parameters used. Four transmitter pulses were simulated, each with a bandwidth of 30 MHz, spaced at 25MHz intervals, with an overlap of 5 MHz between adjacent subspectra. The total radar bandwidth is 105MHz.
 
 
Table I: Simulation Parameters 
 first centre frequency  tex2html_wrap_inline686  5.2625 GHz 
 frequency step size  tex2html_wrap_inline690   25 MHz
 number of steps  n   4
 total radar bandwidth  tex2html_wrap_inline698  105 MHz
 pulse length  tex2html_wrap_inline604  5 tex2html_wrap_inline706 s
 chirp bandwidth  B   30 MHz
 ADC (complex) sample rate   tex2html_wrap_inline712   32 MHz
 

Figure 2 shows the magnitude of the reconstructed target reflectivity spectrum. The ``ripples'' at the three subspectra boundaries are clearly visible. After applying the compression filter shown in Figure 3 one obtains the spectrum shown in Figure 4, which closely approximates the desired tex2html_wrap_inline798 function. A window function has been applied to this spectrum to reduce sidelobe levels. Inverse Fourier transforming this spectrum yields the time-domain high-resolution profile. A dB-plot of a section of this profile is shown in Figure 5, with sidelobe levels at approximately -35dB.
 

VII. Conclusions

The method described in this paper efficiently uses all the information obtained from the stepped-frequency waveforms to produce a high-resolution range profile of the illuminated target scene. The execution of the signal processing steps is fast compared to time-domain implementations, since only FFTs and phase multiplications are required, and no upsampling of the narrow-bandwidth pulses is necessary. Furthermore this method is extremely flexible in the sense that the individual pulses may have different bandwidths, the frequency spacing between pulses may vary, the subspectra may (should) overlap in the frequency domain and the individual frequency steps may already be range-compressed. The resulting range profile does not suffer from multiple ``ghost'' images, except if the construction of the compression filter tex2html_wrap_inline744 is such that the reconstructed target spectrum contains ripples at the subspectra boundaries. It is therefore important that great care is invested in the design of the compression filter.
 

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Rolf Lengenfelder, whose radar simulator was used to create the simulated data, and Jasper Horrell for his suggestions and advice.
 

References

1
 A. Gustavsson, P.O. Frölind, H. Hellsten, T. Jonsson, B. Larsson and G. Stenström, ``The Airborne VHF SAR System CARABAS,'' Proc. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Symp., IGARSS'93, Tokyo, Japan, vol. 2, pp. 558-562, August 1993.
2
 Y. Huang, Z. Ma and S. Mao, ``Stepped-frequency SAR System Design and Signal Processing,'' Proc. European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, EUSAR'96, Königswinter, Germany, pp. 565-568, March 1996.
3
 M.R. Inggs, M.W. van Zyl and A. Knight, ``A Simulation of Synthetic Range Profile Radar,'' Proc. IEEE South African Symp. on Communications and Signal Processing, COMSIG'92, Cape Town, South Africa, pp. 1-6, September 1992.
4
 R.T. Lord and M.R. Inggs, ``High Resolution VHF SAR Processing Using Synthetic Range Profiling,'' Proc. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Symp., IGARSS'96, Lincoln, Nebraska, vol. 1, pp. 454-456, June 1996.  igarss96.pdf
5
 R.T. Lord and M.R. Inggs, ``High Resolution SAR Processing Using Stepped-Frequencies,'' Proc. IEEE Geoscience Remote Sensing Symp., IGARSS'97, Singapore, vol. 1, pp. 490-492, August 1997.  igarss97.pdf
6
 R.T. Lord and M.R. Inggs, ``High Range Resolution Radar using Narrowband Linear Chirps offset in Frequency,'' Proc. IEEE South African Symp. on Communications and Signal Processing, COMSIG'97, Grahamstown, South Africa, pp. 9-12, September 1997.  comsig97.pdf
7
 C. Prati and F. Rocca, ``Range Resolution Enhancement with Multiple SAR Surveys Combination,'' IEEE, 1992.
8
 J.A. Scheer and J.L. Kurtz, Coherent Radar Performance Estimation, Norwood, MA 02062: Artech House, 1993.
9
 L.M.H. Ulander and H. Hellsten, ``System Analysis of Ultra-Wideband VHF SAR,'' RADAR'97, Edinburgh, UK, Included in conference publication no. 449, pp. 104-108, IEE, London, October 1997.
10
 D.R. Wehner, High-Resolution Radar, Second Edition, Norwood, MA 02062: Artech House, 1995.
 
 
 
Return to  Richard Lord's Homepage.